首页> 外文OA文献 >Difficult Decisions:A Qualitative Exploration of the Statistical Decision Making Process from the Perspectives of Psychology Students and Academics
【2h】

Difficult Decisions:A Qualitative Exploration of the Statistical Decision Making Process from the Perspectives of Psychology Students and Academics

机译:困难的决策:从心理学学生和学者的角度对统计决策过程的定性探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantitative research methods are essential to the development of professional competence in psychology. They are also an area of weakness for many students. In particular, students are known to struggle with the skill of selecting quantitative analytical strategies appropriate for common research questions, hypotheses and data types. To begin understanding this apparent deficit, we presented nine psychology undergraduates (who had all completed at least one quantitative methods course) with brief research vignettes, and asked them to explicate the process they would follow to identify an appropriate statistical technique for each. Thematic analysis revealed that all participants found this task challenging, and even those who had completed several research methods courses struggled to articulate how they would approach the vignettes on more than a very superficial and intuitive level. While some students recognized that there is a systematic decision making process that can be followed, none could describe it clearly or completely. We then presented the same vignettes to 10 psychology academics with particular expertise in conducting research and/or research methods instruction. Predictably, these “experts” were able to describe a far more systematic, comprehensive, flexible, and nuanced approach to statistical decision making, which begins early in the research process, and pays consideration to multiple contextual factors. They were sensitive to the challenges that students experience when making statistical decisions, which they attributed partially to how research methods and statistics are commonly taught. This sensitivity was reflected in their pedagogic practices. When asked to consider the format and features of an aid that could facilitate the statistical decision making process, both groups expressed a preference for an accessible, comprehensive and reputable resource that follows a basic decision tree logic. For the academics in particular, this aid should function as a teaching tool, which engages the user with each choice-point in the decision making process, rather than simply providing an “answer.” Based on these findings, we offer suggestions for tools and strategies that could be deployed in the research methods classroom to facilitate and strengthen students' statistical decision making abilities.
机译:定量研究方法对于心理学专业能力的发展至关重要。对于许多学生来说,它们也是一个弱点。尤其是,众所周知,学生难以选择适合常见研究问题,假设和数据类型的定量分析策略。为了开始理解这种明显的缺陷,我们向9名心理学专业的本科生(他们全部完成了至少一个定量方法课程)进行了简短的研究,并要求他们讲解为每个人识别合适的统计技术所遵循的过程。专题分析表明,所有参与者都认为这项任务具有挑战性,甚至那些完成了几种研究方法课程的人都在努力表达自己如何在一个非常肤浅和直观的层面上对待渐晕。尽管有些学生认识到可以遵循系统的决策过程,但是没有人可以清楚或完整地描述它。然后,我们向从事研究和/或研究方法指导的专门知识的10名心理学学者展示了同样的短篇小说。可以预见,这些“专家”能够描述一种更加系统,全面,灵活和细微差别的统计决策方法,该方法始于研究过程的早期,并考虑了多个上下文因素。他们对学生做出统计决策时遇到的挑战很敏感,他们将这些挑战部分归因于通常如何教授研究方法和统计学。这种敏感性反映在他们的教学实践中。当被要求考虑可以促进统计决策过程的援助的形式和特征时,两个小组都表示偏爱遵循基本决策树逻辑的可访问,全面且信誉良好的资源。特别是对于学者而言,此辅助工具应充当教学工具,使用户在决策过程中与每个选择点互动,而不仅仅是提供“答案”。基于这些发现,我们为可在研究方法课堂中部署的工具和策略提供了建议,以促进和增强学生的统计决策能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号